| Heading | Questions to be Asked | ||
| 1 | Title | 1.1 | Is the title concise? | 
| 1.2 | Is the title informative? | ||
| 1.3 | Does the title clearly indicates the content? | ||
| 1.4 | Does the title clearly indicates the research approach used? | ||
| 2 | Author(s) | 2.1 | Does the author(s) have appropriate academic qualifications? | 
| 2.3 | Does the author(s) have appropriate professional qualifications and experience? | ||
| 3 | Abstract | 3.1 | Is there an abstract included? | 
| 3.2 | Does the abstract identify the research problem? | ||
| 3.3 | Does the abstract state the hypotheses (if appropriate)? | ||
| 3.4 | Does the abstract outline the methodology? | ||
| 3.5 | Does the abstract give details of the sample subjects? | ||
| 3.6 | Does the abstract report major findings? | ||
| 4 | Literature Review | 4.1 | Is the literature review up-to-date? | 
| 4.2 | Does the literature review identifies the underlying theoretical framework(s)? | ||
| 4.3 | Does the literature review presents a balanced evaluation of material both supporting and challenging the position being proposed? | ||
| 4.4 | Does the literature clearly identifies the need for the research proposal? | ||
| 4.5 | Are important references omitted? | ||
| 5 | Hypothesis | 5.1 | Does the study uses an experimental approach? | 
| 5.2 | Is the hypothesis capable of testing? | ||
| 5.3 | Is the hypothesis unambiguous? | ||
| 6 | Operational Definitions | 6.1 | Are all terms used in the research question/problem clearly defined? | 
| 7 | Methodology | 7.1 | Does the methodology section clearly state the research approach to be used? | 
| 7.2 | Is the method appropriate to the research problem? | ||
| 7.3 | Are the strengths and weaknesses of the approach chosen stated? | ||
| 8 | Subjects | 8.1 | Are the subjects clearly identified? | 
| 9 | Sample Selection | 9.1 | Is the sample selection approach congruent with the method to be used? | 
| 9.2 | Is the approach to sample selection clearly stated? | ||
| 9.3 | Is the sample size clearly stated? | ||
| 10 | Data Collection | 10.1 | Are any data collection procedures adequately described? | 
| 10.2 | Has the validity and reliability of any instruments or questionnaires been clearly stated? | ||
| 11 | Ethical Issues | 11.1 | If the study involves human subjects has the study ethical committee approval? | 
| 11.2 | Is informed consent sought? | ||
| 11.3 | Is confidentiality assured? | ||
| 11.4 | Is anonymity guaranteed? | ||
| 12 | Results | 12.1 | Are the results presented clearly? | 
| 12.2 | Are the results internally consistent? | ||
| 12.3 | Is sufficient detail is given to enable the reader to judge how much confidence can be placed in the findings? | ||
| 12.4 | Does graphic material enhance the clarity of the results being presented? | ||
| 13 | Data Analysis | 13.1 | Is the approach appropriate to the type of data collected? | 
| 13.2 | Is any statistical analysis correctly performed? | ||
| 13.3 | Is there sufficient analysis to determine whether “significant differences” are not attributable to variations in other relevant variables? | ||
| 13.4 | Is complete information (test value, df and p) reported? | ||
| 14 | Discussion | 14.1 | Is the discussion balanced? | 
| 14.2 | Does the discussion draw upon previous research? | ||
| 14.3 | Are the weaknesses of the study acknowledged? | ||
| 14.4 | Are clinical implications discussed? | ||
| 15 | Conclusions | 15.1 | Are conclusions supported by the results obtained? | 
| 15.2 | Are the implications of the study identified? | ||
| 16 | Recommendations | 16.1 | Do the recommendations suggest further areas for research? | 
| 16.2 | Do the recommendations identify how any weaknesses in the study design could be avoided in future research? | ||
| Table 21: Research Critique Model Template  | 
| Reference(s)  | |||
|  			 				 					Book 				 			 		 |  			  			Gerrish, K. & Lacey, A. (2010) The Research Process in Nursing. John Wiley & Sons: United Kingdom (UK), England, Oxfordshire, Oxford. [ISBN: 9781405190480]. [Available on: Amazon: https://amzn.to/3Dk4fz2].  			 		 | ||
|   Reference (or cite) Article    | ||
|   			  				Kahlon, R. S. (2016) Research Critique Model Template [Online]. dkode: United Kingdom, England, London. [Published on: 2016-01-03]. [Article ID: RSK666-0000128]. [Available on: dkode | Ravi - https://ravi.dkode.co/2016/01/research-critique-model-template.html].  			 		 | ||


![Gerrish, K. & Lacey, A. (2010) The Research Process in Nursing. John Wiley & Sons: United Kingdom (UK), England, Oxfordshire, Oxford. [ISBN: 9781405190480]. [Available on: Amazon: https://amzn.to/3Dk4fz2]. Gerrish, K. & Lacey, A. (2010) The Research Process in Nursing. John Wiley & Sons: United Kingdom (UK), England, Oxfordshire, Oxford. [ISBN: 9781405190480]. [Available on: Amazon: https://amzn.to/3Dk4fz2].](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEicbSQw7CkFznRPNMkBuUb_SZqxpStd7IrTj-RSZFQ3mBQ2lAtZsRcPb-1LtoSkCiTB1VZ_w_mXqrL64-YSh69a3w_xSJIK6oT0Sgi-fyikeBjLa7Wx5iNYPPtXY_-GCH9QPHJAshcrglxFA24jhrurDrt3MQ08vmtHblohyphenhyphenNF_f-1qN88/s1600/Book-2010-Gerrish-Lacey-9781405190480.jpg) 
 			![Kahlon, R. S. (2016) Research Critique Model Template [Online]. dkode: United Kingdom, England, London. [Published on: 2016-01-03]. [Article ID: RSK666-0000128]. [Available on: dkode | Ravi - https://ravi.dkode.co/2016/01/research-critique-model-template.html]. Kahlon, R. S. (2016) Research Critique Model Template [Online]. dkode: United Kingdom, England, London. [Published on: 2016-01-03]. [Article ID: RSK666-0000128]. [Available on: dkode | Ravi - https://ravi.dkode.co/2016/01/research-critique-model-template.html].](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi1QAw0HHVAsw96tyjOTY02IagXr-zhdVtJRyUDsAaICwZroxbpnwCX-zNgES2I34hXdkOxpikEtky4waS6ytDbEa4X1Xw6ty4HJkRFZbI9JJBnmrIw8HhyphenhyphenpQfz3nPPaSOyohjqQSeB2TeROMz4U20KQHWfj46x1sfWQ2JhIMTclZlaecIYCHqYYinU6g5s/s1600/reference-dkode.png) 
 			
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments on this blog are not moderated.
But, offensive ones will be deleted.